bkarnik
10-26 09:56 AM
No... as long as you can show ties to the US (owning a house, paid taxes, etc) you should be OK. In a situation where a company has sent you overseas, if you have adequate documentation to prove that the company had sent you overseas and you are still on the payroll here, you should be OK. Although, to be safe, I would probably try to make a couple of trips back to the US in a year to maintain resident status.
wallpaper of things I despise.
gnutin
04-05 05:12 PM
It is unlikely that your I-140 was revoked because usually they are revoked only for fraud. Also, there is no limit on the time you can have I-140 approved before filing for I-485 and continuing your case. Most likely you cannot file I-485 anyway due to retrogression.
mdforgc
02-20 05:47 AM
I read the link posted. This is an independent think tank about movement of people worldwide and the report in general analyses the three upcoming bills in relation to EB and non EB immigration and illegals. Overall the bill states that immigration is of benefit to the US and the degree of benefit depends on the legality and skill level of the immigrants, and they suggest that Family category 4 and DV category should be eliminated and used for EB immigration and also suggest readjusting the per country cap to accomadate for the reality of more immigrants from the retrogressed countries. I think this is good and we should include this in our presentation to the lawmakers, this will carry good weight.
2011 funny pet pictures,
pnayak
01-11 12:20 PM
Hi All,
I had a question regarding the relationship between the number h1b transfers and green card process. I've heard some people say that if you have transferred H1b to many companies then the green card process will be delayed because USCIS needs to be convinced that you will be continuing with the same employer. Is this true or does it really not matter how many times you change employers it doesn't effect the green card process.
I have already transferred once. I am thinking of transferring one or possible two more times but am just worried about how this will effect the green card application process.
Thanks,
Purushotham Nayak
I had a question regarding the relationship between the number h1b transfers and green card process. I've heard some people say that if you have transferred H1b to many companies then the green card process will be delayed because USCIS needs to be convinced that you will be continuing with the same employer. Is this true or does it really not matter how many times you change employers it doesn't effect the green card process.
I have already transferred once. I am thinking of transferring one or possible two more times but am just worried about how this will effect the green card application process.
Thanks,
Purushotham Nayak
more...
fromnaija
08-13 04:56 PM
USCIS would keep family pack submitted at same time together. In your case it seems like your applications got separated. Taking an INFOPASS appointment may reveal this to IO and you may ask that they confirm that your son's application is together with the family pack.
martinvisalaw
02-18 04:23 PM
My report of the call is here: Law Office of Elaine Martin - immigration news: CIS teleconference today on recent H-1B memo (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2010/02/cis-teleconference-today-on-recent-h-1b.html)
more...
Blog Feeds
07-07 08:10 PM
Temporary Protected Status and Expired Employment Authorization Documents
One must accept a Temporary Protected Status (TPS) beneficiary's expired Employment Authorization Document (EAD) if DHS has automatically extended its validity in a Federal Register notice. Automatically extended EADs are listed on the USCIS web site. EADs issued to TPS beneficiaries will include one of two category codes: �A-12� or �C-19.� You must not require an employee to provide proof that he or she is a national of a country that has been designated for TPS.
When creating a new case in E-Verify for newly hired TPS beneficiaries, select �Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766)� as the document presented and use the date to which the EAD was automatically extended as the expiration date. We recommend that you read the TPS information on the USCIS web site carefully, as the EAD automatic extension is usually shorter than the TPS extension date.
When re-verifying an existing TPS beneficiary�s employment authorization in Section 3 of Form I-9, write down the date to which the EAD was automatically extended as the expiration date. Never use E-Verify to re-verify an existing employee�s employment authorization.
Once the automatic extension of the EAD expires, re-verify the employee�s employment authorization again in Section 3 of either the original Form I-9 or a new Form I-9. The employee may choose to present a new, unexpired EAD, or any other document from List A or C of Form I-9 that shows he or she continues to be authorized to work in the United States. Federal contractors with the FAR E-Verify clause must follow special rules for verifying new and existing employees, including employees in TPS status. Federal Contractor needs to check the Supplemental Guide for Federal Contractors for more information.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/07/everify_news_tps_beneficiary.html)
One must accept a Temporary Protected Status (TPS) beneficiary's expired Employment Authorization Document (EAD) if DHS has automatically extended its validity in a Federal Register notice. Automatically extended EADs are listed on the USCIS web site. EADs issued to TPS beneficiaries will include one of two category codes: �A-12� or �C-19.� You must not require an employee to provide proof that he or she is a national of a country that has been designated for TPS.
When creating a new case in E-Verify for newly hired TPS beneficiaries, select �Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766)� as the document presented and use the date to which the EAD was automatically extended as the expiration date. We recommend that you read the TPS information on the USCIS web site carefully, as the EAD automatic extension is usually shorter than the TPS extension date.
When re-verifying an existing TPS beneficiary�s employment authorization in Section 3 of Form I-9, write down the date to which the EAD was automatically extended as the expiration date. Never use E-Verify to re-verify an existing employee�s employment authorization.
Once the automatic extension of the EAD expires, re-verify the employee�s employment authorization again in Section 3 of either the original Form I-9 or a new Form I-9. The employee may choose to present a new, unexpired EAD, or any other document from List A or C of Form I-9 that shows he or she continues to be authorized to work in the United States. Federal contractors with the FAR E-Verify clause must follow special rules for verifying new and existing employees, including employees in TPS status. Federal Contractor needs to check the Supplemental Guide for Federal Contractors for more information.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/07/everify_news_tps_beneficiary.html)
2010 Posted by FUNNY PETS at 7:06
mita
11-14 03:24 PM
I don't think it is another stimulus package, it is only for the ones who did not claim or were not eligible or became eligible this year.
more...
chunghongchunghong
02-27 04:59 AM
That is very great, it would be better if you add mopre frame after stopping.
Too bad i am very beginner to this and cannot even make a simple movie
Too bad i am very beginner to this and cannot even make a simple movie
hair Funny Pet Photos
pom
10-01 04:53 AM
I could only see the second one, and it's not bad. But I have no idea what you were trying to show... It looks a little bit like my room when I wake up, before I put my glasses on...
pom :cowboy:
pom :cowboy:
more...
pezz77
01-29 09:23 PM
Thank you for the info! Should I give my lawyer a heads up or not worry about changing address on the application (if they still can do that)?
hot Funny pets, animals
Blog Feeds
01-20 07:00 AM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
In a letter to Senator Grassley, the CIS defended their H-1B adjudication practices and their everything under the kitchen sink Request for Evidences.
The CIS is looking into revising the form I-129 to have Petitioner and beneficiary both attest that:
The beneficiary has been advised of the offsite placement and accepts the terms of the H-IB employment, including the job location and possible relocation;
Really? Does anyone working for the software industry not know that they have to work off site. These people are always traveling, the beneficiary KNOWS they have to work off site. Same with Oil Company Engineers. Its the nature of their work. Does CIS seriously think the beneficiary does not know?
2. Placement of the beneficiary offsite during the period of employment will be in compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements of the H-IB nonimmigrant classification;
3. The beneficiary will be paid the prevailing rate of pay at any offsite
location; and,
This is in line with the question on the I-94 application on the plane, "Are you a terrorist." Has anyone ever answered yes to that question? Similarly, will anyone filing an H-1B petition ever say they will not comply with the law?
4. The work itinerary is attached.
The H-1B is given for 3 years. It is difficult to predict the itinerary for all those 3 years. If the work itinerary is for less than 3 years, then the employer has to file the whole H-1B again, with the high fees. And even if they have the work itinerary, the job may be canceled, etc. So what is the point of private employers filing job itineraries with the Government?
All of this simply penalizes the small employers who form the backbone of the American economy.
Contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjee for more detailshttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-2731884981154177550?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2009/12/h-1b-and-cis.html)
In a letter to Senator Grassley, the CIS defended their H-1B adjudication practices and their everything under the kitchen sink Request for Evidences.
The CIS is looking into revising the form I-129 to have Petitioner and beneficiary both attest that:
The beneficiary has been advised of the offsite placement and accepts the terms of the H-IB employment, including the job location and possible relocation;
Really? Does anyone working for the software industry not know that they have to work off site. These people are always traveling, the beneficiary KNOWS they have to work off site. Same with Oil Company Engineers. Its the nature of their work. Does CIS seriously think the beneficiary does not know?
2. Placement of the beneficiary offsite during the period of employment will be in compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements of the H-IB nonimmigrant classification;
3. The beneficiary will be paid the prevailing rate of pay at any offsite
location; and,
This is in line with the question on the I-94 application on the plane, "Are you a terrorist." Has anyone ever answered yes to that question? Similarly, will anyone filing an H-1B petition ever say they will not comply with the law?
4. The work itinerary is attached.
The H-1B is given for 3 years. It is difficult to predict the itinerary for all those 3 years. If the work itinerary is for less than 3 years, then the employer has to file the whole H-1B again, with the high fees. And even if they have the work itinerary, the job may be canceled, etc. So what is the point of private employers filing job itineraries with the Government?
All of this simply penalizes the small employers who form the backbone of the American economy.
Contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjee for more detailshttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-2731884981154177550?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2009/12/h-1b-and-cis.html)
more...
house Zhu Zhu Pets
srigc2010
03-08 03:34 AM
Hi,
I have march 2005 priority date. I got a job in big company. How safe is it to invoke ac21? What all precautions/steps do I need to take? if it is risky, i will continue in my current company. Can you please respond with your experiences?
Thanks so much in advance.
I have march 2005 priority date. I got a job in big company. How safe is it to invoke ac21? What all precautions/steps do I need to take? if it is risky, i will continue in my current company. Can you please respond with your experiences?
Thanks so much in advance.
tattoo General Discussion
yetanotherimmigrant
11-10 12:02 PM
Yes, I realize a H1 transfer is needed to work in another company. And 140 is not approved. So the new company has to start GC all over. Too bad, it looks like priority date cannot be ported since it LC is still in process.
more...
pictures Posted by FUNNY PETS at 10:27
nkavjs
11-07 09:16 PM
On USCIS website, my I131 messages says as Document approved and..so on on Nov 1. Till date I haven'yt recd. any copies yet. Will it come to me or Lawyers?
Thxs
Thxs
dresses Pet Cartoons amp; Funny Pet Stuff
gc28262
07-19 12:43 PM
thanks for the quick response,
Th I-140 is not revoked yet, but the original company that filed it is going to split in to 2 separate companies by the end of the year and I think I-140 will become invalid after that right if the original company doesnt exist anymore??
You can still claim the PD of your old I-140. Once an I-140 is approved PD is yours to keep for life.
Please see a note by Ron Gotcher below.
ImmInfo Newsletter: The effect of an employer withdrawal of an I-140 (http://imminfo.com/News/Newsletter/2010-07/employer-withdrawal-of-I-140.html)
Th I-140 is not revoked yet, but the original company that filed it is going to split in to 2 separate companies by the end of the year and I think I-140 will become invalid after that right if the original company doesnt exist anymore??
You can still claim the PD of your old I-140. Once an I-140 is approved PD is yours to keep for life.
Please see a note by Ron Gotcher below.
ImmInfo Newsletter: The effect of an employer withdrawal of an I-140 (http://imminfo.com/News/Newsletter/2010-07/employer-withdrawal-of-I-140.html)
more...
makeup Install Funny Pets by
wandmaker
11-26 02:04 AM
tanyas_21: Amendment processing time is same as normal H1 processing time. Your status is H4 until the H1B amendment (797 w/ I-94) is approved or You re-enter USA after you get your H1B stamped. USCIS usually sends cable to home consulate mentioned in I-129 about the approval of H1B - It is one of the reason, most of the attorneys' recommend people to get it stamped from home consulate. As long as you go with all the paper work, You can get it stamped from Mexico, and I dont see any issues. Do not attempt to get it stamped from Canada unless you have a verifiable US education. Good luck!
girlfriend Funny pets animals
_funny.jpg "Funny Pets - Banterous")
ImmigrationAnswerMan
01-06 03:04 PM
5 years of progressive experience means that the person progressed within the company in responsibility and job duties, not that the person's salary increased.
*This information is of a general nature for education purposes only and should not be relied upon without first consulting with an immigration law attorney. This information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.
*This information is of a general nature for education purposes only and should not be relied upon without first consulting with an immigration law attorney. This information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.
hairstyles funny-pets-
mckottayam
05-24 08:16 PM
In CIR 2007 (S.1348) Title V, subtitle B is skill act of 2007 SEC.524 says about people with masters and higher degrees will not be counted against the numerical caps. This says it is amending Section 201(b)(1) (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(1)) which is about the numerical caps. As this is in the section of backlog reduction does this mean that those who already are in the process and is backlogged will be given green cards out the numerical cap?
aj_jadeja
03-22 01:25 PM
any update on this ?
aj
aj
TO BE OR NO TO BE
05-24 11:50 AM
I don't understand this, we are talking about these backlogs, which are effecting about 300K - 500K skilled immigrants, and we only have about 4000 members yet. We should take this as challenge and go on to drive to speak to people like us to increase the members strength, so we will have significant backing and Senate / House / President will pay attention to what we request.
Just a thought,
Just a thought,
No comments:
Post a Comment