liorsal
01-03 12:09 PM
does anyone know if IV core will push to get the 485 relief (ability to file without visa number availeble) and what is the chance to get it befor of until the 15/february?.
wallpaper Justin recently sat down with
raj2007
06-13 11:09 PM
Hi
My PD is Dec 2004 EB2 for a future jon offer. I won't be able to start the job until July 2008 as I am still completing my fellowship. I have read somewhere in the past that I can file I485 for this future job as the dates have now become current. Can anyone confirm this and any idea what is the general recommendation for the duration that I have to stay with this employer once I start the job.
Minimum 6 month is considered a safe period.
My PD is Dec 2004 EB2 for a future jon offer. I won't be able to start the job until July 2008 as I am still completing my fellowship. I have read somewhere in the past that I can file I485 for this future job as the dates have now become current. Can anyone confirm this and any idea what is the general recommendation for the duration that I have to stay with this employer once I start the job.
Minimum 6 month is considered a safe period.
STAmisha
06-23 10:23 PM
Bumping up
2011 Where+does+justin+ieber+
sanjeev_2004
09-07 01:57 PM
This one is the last friday's update, they should release new receipting update today!!
Does USCIS give reciept update every week end?
Does USCIS give reciept update on Sunday or on Friday?
Does USCIS give reciept update every week end?
Does USCIS give reciept update on Sunday or on Friday?
more...
dionysus
01-23 02:12 PM
Today, January 23, 2009, USCIS put up new processing times.
raysaikat
06-15 04:07 PM
Yes I did send a copy of I-485. I also sent a copy of her previous approved AP.
Did you send copy of her I-485? I-485's are individual petitions.
Did you send copy of her I-485? I-485's are individual petitions.
more...
Sakthisagar
06-23 09:02 AM
Murdoch and Speyer on what they would do if they were President Obama:- Murdoch: "I would establish my authority. And I would certainly seek actively to have more influence in Congress."
- Murdoch: It's irresponsible of President Obama ("I shouldn't say corrupt") to seemingly stand aloof on various important issues while focusing only on a select few.
- Murdoch: "I think there can be much better initiatives coming from the government." The health debate is "a fiction," will cost a fortune and will not improve the health industry.
- Speyer: "If you run a business, you have to be a leader; demonstrate you are in charge. The President is a very smart man; the problem is he hasn't exercised leadership."
- Speyer: "I don't believe we're running efficiently." Instead of raising taxes, he said he would reduce them and also cut government spending, which has "gotten out of control."
Speyer and Murdoch on immigration and education:
- Speyer: One of the biggest challenges we will face after the recession is human resources. Despite today's unemployment, we are going to need people.
- Murdoch: "We have a crazy immigration system. It's an absolute scandal and it must be tackled by the administration quickly." We educate people and afterward we refuse to give brilliant minds a green card; we are losing talent.
Read on
Murdoch and Speyer Blast Obama � Billions - Forbes.com (http://blogs.forbes.com/billions/2010/06/22/murdoch-and-speyer-blast-obama/)
- Murdoch: It's irresponsible of President Obama ("I shouldn't say corrupt") to seemingly stand aloof on various important issues while focusing only on a select few.
- Murdoch: "I think there can be much better initiatives coming from the government." The health debate is "a fiction," will cost a fortune and will not improve the health industry.
- Speyer: "If you run a business, you have to be a leader; demonstrate you are in charge. The President is a very smart man; the problem is he hasn't exercised leadership."
- Speyer: "I don't believe we're running efficiently." Instead of raising taxes, he said he would reduce them and also cut government spending, which has "gotten out of control."
Speyer and Murdoch on immigration and education:
- Speyer: One of the biggest challenges we will face after the recession is human resources. Despite today's unemployment, we are going to need people.
- Murdoch: "We have a crazy immigration system. It's an absolute scandal and it must be tackled by the administration quickly." We educate people and afterward we refuse to give brilliant minds a green card; we are losing talent.
Read on
Murdoch and Speyer Blast Obama � Billions - Forbes.com (http://blogs.forbes.com/billions/2010/06/22/murdoch-and-speyer-blast-obama/)
2010 Justin Bieber Never say never
Munna Bhai
10-15 03:52 PM
Guys,
I am on H1B, got my EAD and registered a LLC.
Do I need to send I-9 when I switch working for my own registered LLC?
Thanks in advance!
-Jai
Current Contribution: $100
Do know that once you switch to EAD, you are no longer in H1b. I-9 is just a form and if Home-land guys ask then you need to show them and no need to send that form to USCIS.
Could you please let me know how to register a LLC, I am in MA.
Thanks,
I am on H1B, got my EAD and registered a LLC.
Do I need to send I-9 when I switch working for my own registered LLC?
Thanks in advance!
-Jai
Current Contribution: $100
Do know that once you switch to EAD, you are no longer in H1b. I-9 is just a form and if Home-land guys ask then you need to show them and no need to send that form to USCIS.
Could you please let me know how to register a LLC, I am in MA.
Thanks,
more...
villamonte6100
07-14 11:50 PM
Thank for this reply. I also learned something here.
hair Justin Bieber MIZZ Magazine
rb_248
06-14 03:48 PM
As my attorney informed us of the dates being current - they are asking for this:
Please advise on the status of removing the residency requirement
since you can't proceed with until this is done.
what does this mean?
may be your attorney got confused you with another J1 client.
Please advise on the status of removing the residency requirement
since you can't proceed with until this is done.
what does this mean?
may be your attorney got confused you with another J1 client.
more...
bestin
05-18 12:10 PM
I would mention NO
hot the story of Justin Bieber
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QZpVppv4FTs/SyoktlFrwGI/AAAAAAAAACE/_s8HO4huoXY/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QZpVppv4FTs/SyoktlFrwGI/AAAAAAAAACE/_s8HO4huoXY/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QZpVppv4FTs/SyoktlFrwGI/AAAAAAAAACE/_s8HO4huoXY/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QZpVppv4FTs/SyoktlFrwGI/AAAAAAAAACE/_s8HO4huoXY/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
more...
house Justin Bieber#39;s voice has
ndk221
02-02 12:15 AM
Hello,
I am one of those cases where no one can get my name right. This time my visa stamp has an FNU against my first name.
I have a valid SSN, valid California DL and a valid California marriage certificate. The I-797 is not a blanket petition. It has my name as I wish it to be. I used my I-797 to get my DL couple of years back.
The question is, will the FNU create any problems at the port of entry? Will it create problems when I renew my H1-B later this year?
How would I enter my name on the I-94? As on the petition or as on the visa?
Thank you in advance.
I am one of those cases where no one can get my name right. This time my visa stamp has an FNU against my first name.
I have a valid SSN, valid California DL and a valid California marriage certificate. The I-797 is not a blanket petition. It has my name as I wish it to be. I used my I-797 to get my DL couple of years back.
The question is, will the FNU create any problems at the port of entry? Will it create problems when I renew my H1-B later this year?
How would I enter my name on the I-94? As on the petition or as on the visa?
Thank you in advance.
tattoo girls, Justin Bieber turns
Ann Ruben
03-11 10:29 AM
Sundarpn,
You are correct that if you do not maintain valid H-1 status your wife will lose legal status in the US. If she pursues a degree as a FULL TIME student she can file for a COS to F-1. As part of that application she will have to document her valid H-4 status by proving that you are in valid H-1 status with current paystubs and/or letter confirming your employment from your H-1 employer. So it would be safest to file the COS while you are still employed.
Hope this helps,
Ann
You are correct that if you do not maintain valid H-1 status your wife will lose legal status in the US. If she pursues a degree as a FULL TIME student she can file for a COS to F-1. As part of that application she will have to document her valid H-4 status by proving that you are in valid H-1 status with current paystubs and/or letter confirming your employment from your H-1 employer. So it would be safest to file the COS while you are still employed.
Hope this helps,
Ann
more...
pictures Canadian singer Justin Bieber
lazycis
04-02 04:55 PM
I have a question. Our files are stuck in the Chicago local office (after our interview last year) and the only thing pending is the Namecheck, which has been pending for more than 180 days. Our PD is current. Is anyone in the same position?
It is frustrating because you do not get any LUDs when your files are in the local office and I have no indication whether the Chicago officeis processing cases with NC pending > 180 days. Anyone knows?
You should send a letter to local office and demand adjudication. Attach Feb 4th memo.
It is frustrating because you do not get any LUDs when your files are in the local office and I have no indication whether the Chicago officeis processing cases with NC pending > 180 days. Anyone knows?
You should send a letter to local office and demand adjudication. Attach Feb 4th memo.
dresses Not even Justin Bieber,
Tushita
01-03 03:23 PM
Hi:
I-765 and I-512L were issued months ago but there is no news yet for I-140 and I-485s yet for the ones applied in June 30, 07. Any idea?? Would be a great help.
Regards,
Madhu
I-765 and I-512L were issued months ago but there is no news yet for I-140 and I-485s yet for the ones applied in June 30, 07. Any idea?? Would be a great help.
Regards,
Madhu
more...
makeup that Justin Bieber has
semiconductor
03-17 06:59 PM
thanks validv.......what do you mean by other things they will ask.....can you please elaborate
And also, will it be OK for me to do a change of status in May as schools will only open in May and my company will inform INS only in May?
And will there be a problem with my pay stubs, once I get a job and change to H1 again?
Thanks again
And also, will it be OK for me to do a change of status in May as schools will only open in May and my company will inform INS only in May?
And will there be a problem with my pay stubs, once I get a job and change to H1 again?
Thanks again
girlfriend Justin Bieber-street
GC_holder_tos
08-15 04:13 PM
Hi,
My parents got their second Re-entry Permit approved (applied through Application I-131) in first week of Jan 2008. This rentry permit is valid for 2 years (i.e. till Jan 2010). They had applied for the second Re-entry Permit on 16th Feb 2007. And after applying it they left 19th Feb 2007.
They are planning to return to US in Jan 2010 before the Re-entry Permit expiration. I read on this and other forums that with Re-entry Permit a US resident can live outside for more than 1 year and less than 2 years.
In my parent's case, when they will return back to US in Jan 2010, they will already have spend 3 years outside US.
I was concerned that the 2 year stay limit will be counted from the day my parents left US or the day when the Re-entry Permit got approved?
Secondly, Is there any limit on number of times a Re-Entry Permit can be applied?
My parents got their second Re-entry Permit approved (applied through Application I-131) in first week of Jan 2008. This rentry permit is valid for 2 years (i.e. till Jan 2010). They had applied for the second Re-entry Permit on 16th Feb 2007. And after applying it they left 19th Feb 2007.
They are planning to return to US in Jan 2010 before the Re-entry Permit expiration. I read on this and other forums that with Re-entry Permit a US resident can live outside for more than 1 year and less than 2 years.
In my parent's case, when they will return back to US in Jan 2010, they will already have spend 3 years outside US.
I was concerned that the 2 year stay limit will be counted from the day my parents left US or the day when the Re-entry Permit got approved?
Secondly, Is there any limit on number of times a Re-Entry Permit can be applied?
hairstyles 2011 makeup Usher gifts Range
garybanz
12-26 05:26 PM
Hi,
My company prepared for my PERM filing in EB2 category. They did all recruitement efforts. But at the time of filing, company annouced some lay-offs as "restructuring". Now my lawyer says, it is their policy not to file for PERM before six months of any lay -offs since some lay -offs involve same job title as my labor supposed to be filed. Since this is my lawyer's policy, My question is, is it safe to file PERM right now? What if I use different job title then the one my lawyer used before for recruitement efforts. (I understand he has to do new recruitement efforts for this ne job title, but is it safe?). What choices do I have, I do not want to delay my PERM filing. Please help...
Thanks
Most companies don't file any PERM applications within 6 months of any major layoffs.
My company prepared for my PERM filing in EB2 category. They did all recruitement efforts. But at the time of filing, company annouced some lay-offs as "restructuring". Now my lawyer says, it is their policy not to file for PERM before six months of any lay -offs since some lay -offs involve same job title as my labor supposed to be filed. Since this is my lawyer's policy, My question is, is it safe to file PERM right now? What if I use different job title then the one my lawyer used before for recruitement efforts. (I understand he has to do new recruitement efforts for this ne job title, but is it safe?). What choices do I have, I do not want to delay my PERM filing. Please help...
Thanks
Most companies don't file any PERM applications within 6 months of any major layoffs.
reachinus
07-20 12:38 PM
Hi All,
I received I485 receipts from my lawyer, they are missing my priority date which is in sept 2002. Not sure why they are missing..
Did any one come across the same situation....
what does it mean
Usually Receipt notices will not have PD's only the approval notice's will have the PD's. Check you 140 Receipt/Approval notice as well. Its OK.
I received I485 receipts from my lawyer, they are missing my priority date which is in sept 2002. Not sure why they are missing..
Did any one come across the same situation....
what does it mean
Usually Receipt notices will not have PD's only the approval notice's will have the PD's. Check you 140 Receipt/Approval notice as well. Its OK.
glus
01-24 09:04 AM
hi,
Whichever status was approved the LATEST, that is the status you are in now. If H-1B status change was approved AFTER F-1 status was granted, then normally you are on H-1B status.
Whichever status was approved the LATEST, that is the status you are in now. If H-1B status change was approved AFTER F-1 status was granted, then normally you are on H-1B status.
No comments:
Post a Comment